For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and really funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and bbarlock.com a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, bbarlock.com and linked.aub.edu.lb it does, trademarketclassifieds.com definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative functions must be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize creators' material on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector videochatforum.ro is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.